This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Thomas M. Cooley Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Distinguished Briefs
    • Notes
    • Publishing Information
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Letter from the Editor
  • Recognitions
  • Archives
  • House-Style Guide
  • Prospective Members
  • Events
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:12125/feed
Articles
Vol. 39, Issue 1, 2024May 01, 2024 EDT

Answering a Defense of Textualism — and of the Skyrocketing Use of Dictionaries in the Michigan Supreme Court

Joseph Kimble, B.A., J.D.,
dictionarytextualismTrugreenMichiganSupreme Courtlawtextual interpretation
Copyright Logoccby-nc-nd-4.0
Photo by Joshua Hoehne on Unsplash

Articles in Vol. 39, Issue 1, 2024

Vol. 39, Issue 1, 2024
  • 39:1 Publishing Information
    Thomas M. Cooley Law Review
  • Answering a Defense of Textualism — and of the Skyrocketing Use of Dictionaries in the Michigan Supreme Court
    Joseph Kimble
  • An Analytical Depth Chart for Law Professors and Students: How Deep Is Deep Enough, and How Deep Is Too Deep?
    Brendan T. BeeryMatthew P. Marin
  • Loot Boxes: Are They Just Gambling in Disguise?
    Adam Kimball
  • Can Sanctuary Cities Survive the Federal Government?
    Wyatt Wells
Thomas M. Cooley Law Review
Joseph Kimble, Answering a Defense of Textualism — and of the Skyrocketing Use of Dictionaries in the Michigan Supreme Court, 39 Thomas M. Cooley Law Review (2024).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system